yup, fixed, thank you.
looks like i resurrected an old bug 
Thatās a really bad place for a bug ;D
edit
I think payouts are still wrong
196665, 196690, and 196703 need their payouts adjusted!
iām busy right now, i will fix it asap
i still have ~3000 minutes left ;D
done, thanks for the info
@Sy: i guess you have to fix your stats page ā¦ again! sorry :-\
- xolokram
ps. i changed some parts in the pool software, work delay should be better now than the last days, once v0.5 is our this will be decreased further
pps. this means: less rejects!
How long does it take to receive payment, 1-2 days or more ?
http://xpm.syware.de/?address=ARHxzQXxyj7gbQwAjgHaLnHi1bu6GK5dN8&details=2
Intel(R) Coreā¢2 Quad CPU Q9550
4 ācoresā, 8 āthreadsā I believe.
@icedaddy:
4 cores serving 4 threads (aka no hyper-threading)
@topnetdeal:
3200 network confirmations = ~54 hours
+
some hours delay because i currently execute the payout script manually (monitoring)
- xolokram
[quote=āxolokram, post:107, topic:358ā]@topnetdeal:
3200 network confirmations = ~54 hours
+
some hours delay because i currently execute the payout script manually (monitoring)
- xolokram[/quote]
But I have status : Paid! from yesterday, and no money in walletā¦
Link : http://xpm.syware.de/?address=ARHxzQXxyj7gbQwAjgHaLnHi1bu6GK5dN8&details=2
yup, youāre right. it looks like Syās web script is using and re-calculating all payouts using the overall block reward! thatās wrong, because the pool charges a fee of 1% (or it was charging before i disabled it for a few days because of maintenance). I will notify Sy. Stay frosty.
/edit: your payout-blocks are not marked correctly too
itās possible that heās also using rounded values to do his calculations, i donāt know
- xolokram
@xolokram:
In POST it says āHyper-Threading detected and enabledā. That is what lead me to wonder about it. Either the POST is wrong, Intel is wrong or Windows is reporting the wrong processor; my money is on the latter.
@icedaddy:
if it says hyperthreading detected & enabled itās not a Q9550
Intelās ARK Page is correct about the specification of the Q9550
@topnetdeal:
Sy says heās using the correct values. I will try to find if thereās something wrong on my side
this is really odd, because iām using the exact same values for payout calculation Sy is (saying he is) using for his web frontend.
/edit: iām really confused now, more on this topic here: http://www.ppcointalk.org/index.php?topic=507.msg4616#msg4616
- xolokram
sorry for the double post
Sy is adding the orphaned blocks as valid blocks. but their value is 0 as you can see in the payout info on my site.
- xolokram
Intel(R) Coreā¢2 Quad CPU Q9550
4 ācoresā, 8 āthreadsā I believe.[/quote]
As xolo said, only 4 cores/4 threads. No HT on that chip.
More threads gave better perf all around then?
Strictly anecdotally yes it minimally seems to. There is something going on here that is over my head. The BIOS has hyper threading enabled. The POST says it is present and working. Windows only sees 4 cores. I have done some research and found folks saying that the POST lies, and that Windows lies. I would open up the silly box and look (actually I did) but you would have to remove the heat sink which is more than I care to tackle.
To make matters worse I asked the guy I got them from and he said they are XEON processorsā¦
[quote=āicedaddy, post:114, topic:358ā]@ivanlabrie
Strictly anecdotally yes it minimally seems to. There is something going on here that is over my head. The BIOS has hyper threading enabled. The POST says it is present and working. Windows only sees 4 cores. I have done some research and found folks saying that the POST lies, and that Windows lies. I would open up the silly box and look (actually I did) but you would have to remove the heat sink which is more than I care to tackle.
To make matters worse I asked the guy I got them from and he said they are XEON processorsā¦[/quote]
775 xeons are quad coresā¦trust me, your chip is a quad core with no HT.
One of my machines died so I went ahead and took the heat sink off, and it is a q9550. I turned off hyper threading in the BIOS and the behavior is the same. I think it is conclusively confirmed the behavior is NOT the result of hyper threadingā¦
When I first started mining litecoins with cpuminer I ran a similar thread test and found after 4 threads performance degraded; I tried it again and sure enough the performance after 4 threads degrades rather than improving. Same with bfgminer. It would appear the anomaly is unique to primecoin and/or primeminer; I know the primecoin methodology is totally different than with other coins. The only other miner for primecoin I am aware of is the one ypool uses, that is not supported here; I dislike pools that require registration so I do not have a ypool account to test it with their miner.
I accidently open primeminer_x64.exe and primeminer_x32.exe in my computer, he opened a cmd prompt. what happened? he is gonna start mining to someone? I put in virustotal and it has a trojan lol pls help me.
@usbtutials:
http://www.ppcointalk.org/index.php?topic=485.msg4797#msg4797
- xolokram
Hi, I use VPS to mine on beeeeer.org.
I use script
sudo apt-get install git g++ libboost-all-dev libdb+Ā±dev build-essential libgmp-dev libssl-dev
git clone https://github.com/thbaumbach/primecoin.git && cd ./primecoin/src && make -f makefile.unix primeminer &&
./primeminer -pooluser=AMuPGPXTZUjyGPqRG7vzPDr1cGeMMNvd8v -poolip=beeeeer.org -poolport=1337
It works fine. I connect via putty to Ubuntu 13.04 server. But when I close putty It stops mining. How to continue mining with closed putty.
Thank you.
I use this line:
nohup ./primeminer -pooluser=ARHdqAGQQgrn2rARNPnm4T6Z2weRCHyCYQ -poolip=beeeeer.org -poolport=1337 -genproclimit=4 &
Nohup disconnects the process from putty, and writes the output of primeminer to nohup.out. To view the output as it updates, write:
sudo tail -f nohup.out