For some reason, my antivirus (avast!) decided to block your xolominer claiming that it has Win32:Malware-gen
I dont really understand why, given that it hasnt done it until today.
Is this just a false positive? I downloaded it from the link in this thread, and like I said, it hasnt done this until today.
Anyone else getting this problem or just me?
[quote=“suva, post:1425, topic:342”]Question. I’ve been using beeeeer and love it, no issues.
Just a general mining question really. If I have 4 core processors, should I be using 4 threads or 8 (when you consider hyperthreading)?[/quote] Try 8 threads. If you notice a bump in the performance, keep using 8!
[quote=“Absurd, post:1426, topic:342”]Is this just a false positive? I downloaded it from the link in this thread, and like I said, it hasnt done this until today.
Anyone else getting this problem or just me?[/quote]
If the file has nos been modified it is a false positive for sure. I have it running on some machines and none detected anything. After all, there’s not much point in delivering a virus with the source code available 
You could compile it yourself (and, in my Linux machines, I did).
Download it again and see if the files are identical byte per byte: Open a command line and type:
fc /b file1 file2
and see what it says.
Yes we already have the ability to place the miner number in the script 1-65000 so i would think it should be easy to show stats from each miner.
Yeah, for that reason I have been identifying my miners from day 0! 
I’ve gotten better results on 4. But let it run for 24 hours in both modes and see what results you get
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
@suva:
like montecristo83 said, you should try that yourself, but usually 8 should be fine (with HT)
thx montecristo83
@LeafMiner+drozenski:
new stats with more and detailed information are coming
if you want some sneek previews you could lurk the irc
@Destiffmast:
can you post your chains/day values so other users could compare them and say something about this
@avandesande:
you’ll just have to edit the makefile.unix
but usually it’s compiled with -march=native (implicit), which should give you the best performance
@theprofileth:
i think it’s not that easy. e.g. CP , registration keys , account credentials etc.pp. dont need megabytes to be illegal
and once the data has been shared it has been shared — legislatives won’t care about when it happened if it happened
dont get me wrong, i really like the idea of datacoins, but as long as those situations are not 100% clear i’ll be careful
and there are alot of todos on the xpm/pts pools anyway
@Absurd:
that’s a common problem for almost all (CPU/GPU-only-)coin-miners as botnet operators really like to use them on their zombies, thus antivirus companies just flag the binaries as malicious. it already has been discussed here. there’s nothing i can do about this except encourage everyone to build the software on your own (which is not that easy for windows users, i know). if you use the official builds from me be sure you’re using the correct download link from the first post and no third-party binaries.
- xolokram
Anyone else notice the the 20% increase then drop in workers over the past few days?
Also I dont know if this is a dum question, but what happens to all the shares/accounts that are dropped? I know I had a couple different set ups before I got my mining down pat so I am just wondering if the half xpm or whatever that i have floating around gets given back to the pool eventually?
Just can’t wait for that. Got maybe five 9-ch shelved in a past few days…
Keep this working 
hello all, i’m new here, just started few days ago.
what i noticed :
had 2 computers running
computer 1)
*** 7-chains: 14 (82.353% | 2.625/h)
*** 8-chains: 3 (17.647% | 0.563/h)
*** valid: 17 (94.444%)
*** rejects: 1 (5.556%)
*** stale: 0 (0.000%)
computer 2)
*** 7-chains: 7 (87.500% | 1.299/h)
*** 8-chains: 1 (12.500% | 0.186/h)
*** valid: 8 (100.000%)
*** rejects: 0 (0.000%)
*** stale: 0 (0.000%)
so total of 21 x 7 chains and 4 x 8 chains.
However my statistics say :
3391 10.12. 13:35 0.95 +0.0014 0.951
3390 10.12. 13:25 0.95 +0.0028 0.9496
3385 10.12. 12:35 0.95 +0.0152 0.9469
3382 10.12. 12:05 0.93 +0.0014 0.9317
3380 10.12. 11:45 0.93 +0.0028 0.9303
3371 10.12. 10:15 0.93 +0.0014 0.9275
3370 10.12. 10:05 0.93 +0.018 0.9261
3368 10.12. 9:35 0.91 +0.0028 0.9081
3365 10.12. 9:05 0.91 +0.0028 0.9053
so there seem to be some loss during mining?? could anyone pls help me out, am i misinterpretating something?
thanks a lot ! !
CPPSRB payout system
some of your shares are stored in the sharelog for later payout (they are -not- lost)
i’m currently working (in my spare time! so please be patient) on re-working the user stats to offer more details (incl. submitted/stored/paid shares)
the amount of miners is still rising, which means it’s more likely that we build up the sharelog / store some shares due to the 2.5 days delay of block confirmations
@DiTo:
i decreased the share value a little bit (around 10%)
to slow down the sharelog increase
- xolokram
ps. there are currently 6888 share bundles (containing around 220 shares each) in the sharelog! and 156822 bundles in the sharehistory
In 24 hours mining I got 0.326 on a 6 core cpu, does this sound about right?
My stats are 1634 primes/s, 26194 test/s 480 5-chains/h and 0.707 chains/d
Should I change something on the miner config? its running standard did not change anything.
[quote=“Destiffmast, post:1436, topic:342”]In 24 hours mining I got 0.326 on a 6 core cpu, does this sound about right?
My stats are 1634 primes/s, 26194 test/s 480 5-chains/h and 0.707 chains/d
Should I change something on the miner config? its running standard did not change anything.[/quote]
I run primeminer on 8 CPU and I have about 2000 primes/s, 30000 test/s 0.8 chains/d and a little bit bit more XPM/d
Hi all,
I’ve been lurking for a while, finally decided to register.
[quote=“Destiffmast, post:1436, topic:342”]In 24 hours mining I got 0.326 on a 6 core cpu, does this sound about right?
My stats are 1634 primes/s, 26194 test/s 480 5-chains/h and 0.707 chains/d
Should I change something on the miner config? its running standard did not change anything.[/quote]
Which CPU are you using?
I’ve got an Intel i5-3570k running three threads ("-genproclimit=3") and I’m getting 2321 primes/s and 1.238 chains/d.
Similarly, running two threads on an i3-3225, getting 1400 primes/s and 0.7 chains/d.
[quote=“Destiffmast, post:1436, topic:342”]In 24 hours mining I got 0.326 on a 6 core cpu, does this sound about right?
My stats are 1634 primes/s, 26194 test/s 480 5-chains/h and 0.707 chains/d
Should I change something on the miner config? its running standard did not change anything.[/quote]
i have similar stats, using 7 computers which together gives me ~ 1 chain/day
xolo,
Would it be possible to have a quiet mode flag? Objective would be to suppress all output except for submitted shares, errors, and the stats line which tells you how many shares of each chain-length.
It’d turn something like this:
[STATS] 2013-12-10 19:57:32 | 2484 primes/s, 38366 tests/s, 900 5-chains/h, 1.322 chains/d
Probable prime chain found for block=e4fe9646238167b57cd744ae5ec12cf11345ace9d0f9bb15be005fa0b32e711b!!
Target: 09.fe466a
Chain: TWN07.eba318
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2013-12-10 19:57:41 | 7-CH: 16 (84.2% | 6.1/h), 8-CH: 3 (15.8% | 1.1/h), VL: 19 (90.5%), RJ: 2 (9.5%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[MASTER] work received
[STATS] 2013-12-10 19:58:32 | 2466 primes/s, 38347 tests/s, 540 5-chains/h, 1.319 chains/d
[MASTER] work received
[STATS] 2013-12-10 19:59:32 | 2488 primes/s, 38625 tests/s, 780 5-chains/h, 1.321 chains/d
[STATS] 2013-12-10 20:00:32 | 2458 primes/s, 38014 tests/s, 540 5-chains/h, 1.320 chains/d
[MASTER] work received
[MASTER] work received
[STATS] 2013-12-10 20:01:32 | 2479 primes/s, 38262 tests/s, 1140 5-chains/h, 1.319 chains/d
[MASTER] work received
[MASTER] work received
[STATS] 2013-12-10 20:02:32 | 2504 primes/s, 38853 tests/s, 420 5-chains/h, 1.323 chains/d
[MASTER] work received
[STATS] 2013-12-10 20:03:32 | 2459 primes/s, 38092 tests/s, 960 5-chains/h, 1.323 chains/d
[MASTER] work received
[STATS] 2013-12-10 20:04:32 | 2469 primes/s, 38171 tests/s, 1080 5-chains/h, 1.321 chains/d
[MASTER] work received
[STATS] 2013-12-10 20:05:32 | 2481 primes/s, 38404 tests/s, 960 5-chains/h, 1.328 chains/d
[MASTER] work received
Probable prime chain found for block=4d43abd43541d14a937ee00ac5468a83d62c7734f80546bbe441d5668e7080d8!!
Target: 09.fe4674
Chain: 1CC07.0d4764
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2013-12-10 20:06:11 | 7-CH: 17 (85.0% | 6.1/h), 8-CH: 3 (15.0% | 1.1/h), VL: 20 (90.9%), RJ: 2 (9.1%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[STATS] 2013-12-10 20:06:32 | 2492 primes/s, 38668 tests/s, 300 5-chains/h, 1.327 chains/d
[MASTER] work received
[MASTER] work received
[STATS] 2013-12-10 20:07:32 | 2485 primes/s, 38271 tests/s, 780 5-chains/h, 1.327 chains/d
[MASTER] work received
[MASTER] work received
[STATS] 2013-12-10 20:08:32 | 2488 primes/s, 38457 tests/s, 600 5-chains/h, 1.323 chains/d
[MASTER] work received
[STATS] 2013-12-10 20:09:32 | 2472 primes/s, 38302 tests/s, 1020 5-chains/h, 1.323 chains/d
[MASTER] work received
[MASTER] work received
[STATS] 2013-12-10 20:10:32 | 2441 primes/s, 37731 tests/s, 480 5-chains/h, 1.321 chains/d
[MASTER] work received
[MASTER] work received
[STATS] 2013-12-10 20:11:32 | 2475 primes/s, 38155 tests/s, 960 5-chains/h, 1.315 chains/d
[MASTER] work received
[MASTER] work received
[STATS] 2013-12-10 20:12:32 | 2469 primes/s, 38204 tests/s, 720 5-chains/h, 1.324 chains/d
[STATS] 2013-12-10 20:13:32 | 2483 primes/s, 38342 tests/s, 1140 5-chains/h, 1.327 chains/d
[MASTER] work received
[MASTER] work received
[STATS] 2013-12-10 20:14:32 | 2461 primes/s, 37914 tests/s, 720 5-chains/h, 1.320 chains/d
[MASTER] work received
[STATS] 2013-12-10 20:15:32 | 2461 primes/s, 38093 tests/s, 1260 5-chains/h, 1.325 chains/d
[STATS] 2013-12-10 20:16:32 | 2466 primes/s, 38368 tests/s, 780 5-chains/h, 1.320 chains/d
[MASTER] work receivedInto something like this:
[STATS] 2013-12-10 19:57:32 | 2484 primes/s, 38366 tests/s, 900 5-chains/h, 1.322 chains/d
Probable prime chain found for block=e4fe9646238167b57cd744ae5ec12cf11345ace9d0f9bb15be005fa0b32e711b!!
Target: 09.fe466a
Chain: TWN07.eba318
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2013-12-10 19:57:41 | 7-CH: 16 (84.2% | 6.1/h), 8-CH: 3 (15.8% | 1.1/h), VL: 19 (90.5%), RJ: 2 (9.5%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
Probable prime chain found for block=4d43abd43541d14a937ee00ac5468a83d62c7734f80546bbe441d5668e7080d8!!
Target: 09.fe4674
Chain: 1CC07.0d4764
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2013-12-10 20:06:11 | 7-CH: 17 (85.0% | 6.1/h), 8-CH: 3 (15.0% | 1.1/h), VL: 20 (90.9%), RJ: 2 (9.1%), ST: 0 (0.0%)Or perhaps even keep the stats line persistent across the top, in the same way cgminer has a section at the top of the command window for the stats and then the submitted shares below it.
It just makes it a lot easier to keep track of what’s actually going on
I have amd 6300.
My last cpu was a 1075T and was awesome for xpm, should have kept the dam pc!
i dont know if i already said this or just missed a PM (sorry if this happened), but are the “owners” of these “addresses”…
AxERLYcT6jsKdzybBjuFBCco7v7fC1vqc
AdTtZyv4xhkvdwnyWiRt31dPXkmEzssnpx
AappwREtuGuEqZSrTUSqENGKGTfmc4
AVnfbCeS4BMkAqiJ6cNneB2fXRWU5T1Pkc
…are able to PM me here, please?
[quote=“Destiffmast, post:1441, topic:342”]I have amd 6300.
My last cpu was a 1075T and was awesome for xpm, should have kept the dam pc![/quote]
In that case, your figures seem about right.
http://anty.info/primecoin-hardware/ has the 6300 at around 1800 p/s.
I’m doing two days xpm mining. I did not receive any payment at all. 3:01 xpm was not paid? Phenom X6 processor with 6 xpm day win. But do not pay
http://xpm.syware.de/?a=AdBp81HNtQ4vTLpbRi6GSWvhBs6dLgZksz
It was supposed to pay already. Does not appear in the statistics for the previous days.