A typographical error on a single additional character in [Zerocoin] code allowed an attacker to create Zerocoin spend transactions without a corresponding mint.
Just one more way I’ve appreciated Peercoin’s development from August 2012 to Feb 2017 so far.
@ppcman Can’t this happen also to Peercoin? I’m almost sure there is at least one typo present in the code. Of course, it has matured over the last 5 years, but new code is merged. So tell me, why shouldn’t this happen to Peercoin?