Prime4commit is very similar to tip4commit and faces the same issues as described here: http://www.peercointalk.org/index.php?topic=3575.0
Tip4commit has taken actions to fix the problems. So I could merge them into prime4commit.
But I’m wondering whether prime4commit should take the peer4commit direction instead. What do you think?
Yeah I really like the work and direction u went with peer4commit so you have my vote to go the same way with prime4commit
Sent from my HTC Desire using Tapatalk 2
I merged peer4commit changes into prime4commit, including the latest changes: https://www.peercointalk.org/index.php?topic=3575.msg39239#msg39239
Thanks for looking after prime4commit [member=30141]sigmike[/member]
Oh, having the “follower” count (watchers/stared) on the project listing page was kind of nice in the last iteration…possible to revive that feature?
Heh, last message for now. [member=30141]sigmike[/member] looks like there are some interesting pull requests that might be worth encouraging over in https://github.com/sigmike/prime4commit/pulls
Happy to see sigmike on primecoin!