In case it’s helpful for this conversation, the Nu team has been using https://readme.io/ for our documentation (http://docs.nubits.com) and have been really happy with the product. It’s a bit of a mix between a wiki and a locked-down documentation set because it allows viewers to make recommendations, but doesn’t give them full control to edit the content.
I agree. I also think its a good idea.
For a long time I was reluctant to push out the myth thread to people, being a little bit worried that the content hadn’t not properly vetted. Well as it turns out, no-one seem to have time (or interest, but mostly time I think) to do it.
I’m confident that the content in the thread isn’t totally crazy wrong, so I’m beginning to play with this idea of instead pushing the thread out there and have the critiques trolling it instead. If they find anything wrong with the myth’s, the criticized myth could then be discussed more thoroughly. That way they trolls could start working for us. For free.
I say, push the myth’s up to the wiki and let’s take it from there. On a wiki the content can be easily changed and history diffed. That’s perfect for discussing myth’s I think.[/quote]
pillow’s myths, now available in wiki form: http://wiki.peercointalk.org/index.php?title=Myths