[quote=“Cybnate, post:27, topic:1436”][quote=“jubalix, post:25, topic:1436”][quote=“Cybnate, post:5, topic:1436”]Nice catch. This is promising. Just bought a few more PPC. Would also help to mint blocks.
Predictions may only become true because they were predicted :o
The ‘browser’ for cryptos, interesting. The killer-app I would say. Tokens, IPOs, DACs call them all out. The concepts are already out there what is going to break through in 2014? Mobile wallets with NFC? Distributed messaging/news? Distributed AI entities?
So maybe the cryptos are not real game changers, just the protocol and the predecessor to something even bigger.
For Peercoin it would be great to get the ability to add metadata to the blockchain with 0.4, this would enable further innovation. I expect not much less from Sunny 8)[/quote]
I like how thin and fast the blockchain for Peercoin is and that it aims at backbone market which is where the real value is, big $, trillions, not the 10’s million of craptastic on ebay/amazon/newegg/ retail space.
So stuffing the blockchain full of data may dilute what PeerCoin aims for.
Big end banks, buying houses, settling the nightly, currency swaps etc, they want/require a clean, no mess, clear system. PeerCoin becomes the merchant bank space, the rest squabble in the retail space. You can almost hear your footsteps echo down our minted marble floors when you come into the PeerCoin forum/world.[/quote]
It’s is great to have a lean blockchain and I agree we need to keep it as lean as possible. However we need to compete with the world around us and provide some additional attractive services to increase value and acceptance. When implemented smartly the amount of metadata required in the main blockchain can be minimal e.g. with separate optional blockchains with detailed information which directly link to the master Peercoin blockchain which can be sold at a premium transaction cost. How those nested blockchains would work in more detail is probably a topic for another thread.
With nested blockchains people who only need the core services still enjoy a lean core blockchain while we still can serve more demanding customers who want extended services in separate blockchains and are willing to pay for that. They would be the only ones who need to download the nested, but potentially more bloated blockchains. To ensure distribution you probably need to have a separate fee in that blockchain which can be used to ensure additional security and distribution of those additional blockchains. E.g. you can add an additional 1% PoS on top of the 1% PoS in the core blockchain specifically for securing those ‘bloated’ blockchains. Interesting is that this would basically exploit a weakness in the PoS system by enabling people to PoS on multiple in this case nested (potentially bloated) blockchains with the same coins in a way that it adds value to the network. I think Peershare could also profit from this type of integration achieving a win-win.
Just a thought: People on minted marble floors usually have more demands than average, but are also able to pay for it. I think we should not leave that market to someone else (e.g. ethereum) and therefore prepare the network for those smart solutions which can possibly sold at a premium.
Hope this is a self-fulfulling prohecy[/quote]
I have to agree with you, there is some need for good add ons to a blockchain, and this can likely be done in a thin high value add for PeerCoin. PeerShare for example looks to be doing this and has attracted some serious capital.
It is win, win.
PeerCoin is the long, long game. for those that can see beyond the short buzz of getting a new plasticy thing and waveing it around feeling good until the next one comes out 10 seconds later.
PeerCoin is about those who value the inculcation of deep learning to the next generation and themselves about matters of worth. Their frivolity would be to spend on a library of quality books, when you can get it digitally.