that’s the linked at the cryptoid logo
Sorry i misunderstood, looks good!
I have sent @MAL a message in chat asking him to include this link in our website navigation, as well as to add another dropdown menu called Resources. We’ll keep it like this until we are able to do a redesign and make a proper Block Explorer page on the site. Thanks for your help @willy!
It’s been added as “Block Explorers” under a new Resources header on peercoin.net. Thanks for putting that site together.
Thank you.
https://abe.peercoinexplorer.net/chain/Peercoin
is live now. Made small design changes to make it distinguishable from @MatthewLM’s peercoinexplorer.net.
And thank’s @MatthewLM for the great support.
Edit: Encountered an error with the API, down again.
Sorry, but after this we can use it as secondary trusted server for the android app.
I’ve created a little site for Peercoin’s mempool. Check it out: https://www.peercoinexplorer.net/mempool/
In other news:
You may now add the server as a trusted server to your Peercoin Android App.
URL: https://abe.peercoinexplorer.net/q/getvalidhashes
Coinpayments doesn’t seem to be up to date?
Will add bitinfo.
Chryptoid is already listed.
@Willy, could you add https://peercoin.holytransaction.com/ and https://peercoin-testnet.holytransaction.com to peercoinexplorer.net? Francesco on Telegram/Peercoin Chat brought them up in general chat.
Thanks
Thank’s. I will add them tomorrow night.
I modified the design of my explorer to match the updated branding of Peercoin: https://peercoinexplorer.info/chain/Peercoin
When I view the website from my iPhone it seems broken. Does this happen to anyone else? Here is an image…
Also, I think the lighter background where the text is written would look much nicer if it was using the same color code as what the forum and chat use, which is #f6f6f6
I changed the colour to #f6f6f6 and I also made it work a bit more nicely on mobile, though it’s not completely optimised for mobile.
Nice, I can confirm it no longer scrolls off the screen.
I’m planning to create a /inflation site showing peercoins YTD inflation rate.
That page would list:
-Coins minted
-Coins mined
-Coins destroyed by transaction fees
-comparison of total existing PPC now and YTD
-amount of USD needed per day/month/ytd to flow into the market to keep the current USD price
Anything else?
@mhps you’ve always been a safe bet for statistics, pinging you for that reason
Uhhh, https://peercoin.mintr.org/stats already has some. or the last 24hr
Blocks Found 135 (PoS:131 / PoW:4)
PPC Minted 408.88 PPC
Minutes Between Blocks 10.67
Transactions 875
Total Fees -226.61994883 PPC
Total Transaction Output 3,902,197.265872 PPC
Coin Days Destroyed 44,198,798.6314618 => 11.32780417 Days/Coin
4 million coins transacted. The minted amount were not much more than destroyyed in tx fee!
For stats thst one cannot find anywhere yet, how about an effectivr inflation rate if you mint?
If not all coins are minting, those do mint will get more than 1% per year. Since the money supply is increasing by 1% a year due to minting, those who mint will feel that the inflation due to minting is lower.
For example there are 12% coins minting. Every full-time minter gets 8% reward from minting effectively. Consider the 1% moneysupply inflation and POW inflatioin and tx fee deflation rate , the net inflation for full-time minters can be very low or even negative.
A realtime minting rate followed by effective minter’s inflation is a great way to motivate minting.
I was hoping to do something similar if only I had the time, which I don’t at te moment. It would be nice to have some statistics. In particular I was thinking about some charts such as:
- Annualised inflation rate over the last 7 days or so.
- Total coin supply
- Estimated transaction volume
- PoW reward
- PoW difficulty and PoS difficulty.
Yes… that would be nice. But I think that sum is including change outputs.
The PoS reward is based upon the coin-age of the coins being minted, and so if fewer people are minting the inflation rate would be lower. The reward is given like this:
int64 GetProofOfStakeReward(int64 nCoinAge)
{
static int64 nRewardCoinYear = CENT; // creation amount per coin-year
int64 nSubsidy = nCoinAge * 33 / (365 * 33 + 8) * nRewardCoinYear;
return nSubsidy;
}
I don’t understand the point of * 33 / (365 * 33 + 8)
and why it isn’t simply something like nCoinAge / 365 * nRewardCoinYear
but maybe someone can enlighten me.
Edit: * 33 / (365 * 33 + 8)
is used to get a precise Gregorian year.