Suppose there is a disagreement amongst the users of a pow chain. Any combination of the pow users, development team, or miners disagreeing with each other.
A fork occurs though without large miners or a strong mining pool backing it. A malicious miner or pool is then able to at will take over or disrupt the forked chain.
Is this a good thing? Is there a way around it?
Now suppose in pos a disagreement occurs creating a fork. A disgruntled stakeholder tries to disrupt the fork. Should the pos fork create another fork and ban the disruptive stakeholder assets in the new fork?