Actually we are happy to receive funding from the community, we just can't give anything back directly to anyone who provides funding on this open source software, so we haven't asked.
Allow me to wax a bit philosophical here. Good relationships, whether business or personal, will protect and enhance the selfish interests of everyone involved. Do the relationships I am building around the Peershare project protect my own selfish interests? Yes, they do. Do these same relationships also protect the selfish interests of the people on the other side of each relationship? Apparently, yes. Will Peershare protect the selfish interests of any business that chooses to implement it? I certainly hope so. If it can't protect the selfish interests of a business, it won't and shouldn't be adopted. Will Peershare protect the selfish interests of a large number of shareholders of a variety of businesses? Yes. Will Peershare protect the selfish interests of Peercoin holders? Certainly.
So, Peershare isn't about protecting just my selfish interests. Its about finding a way to enhance and advance the selfish interests of many, many people without harming the selfish interests of anyone directly involved.
I think what you are really complaining about is that you can't find a way to have Peershare meet your own selfish interests at this time. That is understandably frustrating. I can't figure out a way to invite investment from the public at this time in a way that meets public expectations for disclosure without compromising the probability of our extension of Peershare succeeding.
This is worth repeating: Because a business owner using Peershare must purchase Peercoins before he can distribute them as dividends, Peershare will certainly increase demand for Peercoins. So, if you are bullish on Peershare, buying Peercoins is the right trade.